ChatGPT 
Claude 
Perplexity Understand your report
After a visibility report completes, Krastie summarizes how AI models talk about your brand compared to competitors across the prompts you tracked.
Overall score
The overall or self score reflects how often your brand is mentioned, cited, or recommended across tracked prompts and models. Higher scores mean stronger presence in AI-generated answers.
Scores are relative to your prompt set and competitors — compare trends over time rather than treating a single number as absolute.
Provider breakdown
Provider scores show performance by AI platform (for example ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity). Use this to see where you are strong or weak:
- A low score on one provider may mean content or citations that model favors are missing.
- Consistent gaps across providers often point to category positioning or source authority issues.
Competitor comparison
The report highlights where competitors appear and you do not on the same prompts. Look for:
- Prompts where rivals are named but you are absent
- Shared prompts where you are mentioned but not recommended
- Citation patterns (who gets linked as a trusted source)
Prioritize prompts with high commercial intent where competitors dominate.
Recommendations
Krastie generates prioritized recommendations based on actual model responses — not generic SEO checklists. Each item ties back to gaps found in the report (missing mentions, weak citations, competitor positioning).
Treat recommendations as a backlog: tackle high-intent gaps first, then re-run or refresh the report to measure change.
History and trends
History charts show how scores move across refreshes. Use history to:
- Validate that content or positioning changes improved visibility
- Catch regressions when competitors publish new material
- Report progress to stakeholders on a regular cadence
Fetch history in the product UI or with GET /v1/ai/generate/seo-site-report/history — see AI visibility API.